Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group

Author:

Meredith Sean J.1,Rauer Thomas1,Chmielewski Terese L.1,Fink Christian1,Diermeier Theresa1,Rothrauff Benjamin B.1,Svantesson Eleonor1,Hamrin Senorski Eric1,Hewett Timothy E.1,Sherman Seth L.1,Lesniak Bryson P.1,Bizzini Mario1,Chen Shiyi1,Cohen Moises1,Villa Stefano Della1,Engebretsen Lars1,Feng Hua1,Ferretti Mario1,Fu Freddie H.1,Imhoff Andreas B.1,Kaeding Christopher C.1,Karlsson Jon1,Kuroda Ryosuke1,Lynch Andrew D.1,Menetrey Jacques1,Musahl Volker1,Navarro Ronald A.1,Rabuck Stephen J.1,Siebold Rainer1,Snyder-Mackler Lynn1,Spalding Tim1,van Eck Carola1,Vyas Dharmesh1,Webster Kate1,Wilk Kevin1,

Affiliation:

1. Investigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Abstract

Background: A precise and consistent definition of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is lacking, and there is controversy surrounding the process of returning patients to sport and their previous activity level. Purpose: The aim of the Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group was to provide a clear definition of RTS after ACL injury and a description of the RTS continuum as well as provide clinical guidance on RTS testing and decision-making. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: An international, multidisciplinary group of ACL experts convened as part of a consensus meeting. Consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi method. Literature review was performed to report the supporting evidence. Results: Key points include that RTS is characterized by achievement of the preinjury level of sport and involves a criteria-based progression from return to participation to RTS and, ultimately, return to performance. Purely time-based RTS decision-making should be abandoned. Progression occurs along an RTS continuum, with decision-making by a multidisciplinary group that incorporates objective physical examination data and validated and peer-reviewed RTS tests, which should involve functional assessment as well as psychological readiness. Consideration should be given to biological healing, contextual factors, and concomitant injuries. Conclusion: The resultant consensus statements and scientific rationale aim to inform the reader of the complex process of RTS after ACL injury that occurs along a dynamic continuum. Research is needed to determine the ideal RTS test battery, the best implementation of psychological readiness testing, and methods for the biological assessment of healing and recovery.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3