Incidence Rates and Pathology Types of Boxing-Specific Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century

Author:

Mao Yunhe1,Zhao Dongmei1,Li Jian1,Fu Weili1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Abstract

Background:To the best of our knowledge, an evidence-based investigation into 21st-century boxing-specific injury rates and types has yet to be performed.Purpose:To provide an overview and quantitative synthesis of the incidence rates (IRs) and pathological categorizations of boxing-specific injuries in the 21st century.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched literature published from January 2000 to November 2021 in PubMed and the Cochrane Library systematically for qualifying epidemiology studies of organized boxing activities across the world. Two independent reviewers completed the literature review, data extraction, and quality assessment. The IRs of injuries per 1000 boxers (IRN), per 1000 competition exposures (IRE), and per 1000 minutes of competition (IRC) or training (IRT) were subsequently calculated. Single-arm meta-analyses were performed for the subgroups of different types of boxing. Sample size weighted means were calculated using a random-effects model in all studies with 95% CIs.Results:Out of an initial 9584 articles, 14 studies were included, with most (11/14) having a moderate level of quality. The pooled IRNin overall injuries was 223.9 (95% CI, 157.5-290.4), the IREwas 233.3 (95% CI, 161.3-305.2), and the IRCwas 13.0 (95% CI, 8.9-17.1). In professional boxing, the IRN(399.8), IRE(379.8), and IRC(23.9) were all significantly higher than in the amateur and female groups. The IRE(76.6 vs 250.6; P < .000) and IRC(9.2 vs 15.4; P < .000) in amateur boxing were significantly lower in studies between 2010 and 2019 than in earlier studies. For pathology categorization, the pooled frequencies were 12.3% (95% CI, 8.7%-15.9%) for concussion, 21.4% (95% CI, 14.1%-28.6%) for skin laceration, 30.2% (95% CI, 22.1%-38.2%) for soft tissue contusion, 15.3% (95% CI, 7.7%-22.9%) for sprain and muscle/ligament injury, and 11.4% (95% CI, 2.7%-20.1%) for fracture.Conclusion:IRs of injury remain high in professional boxing, although they have decreased in the past 10 years in amateur boxing. Soft tissue contusion was the most common injury type. Better exposure measurements and epidemiologic indicators should be applied in future studies.Registration:CRD42021289993 (PROSPERO).

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference70 articles.

1. Alexander C, Sammons JT. Beyond the Ring: The Role of Boxing in American Society (Sport and Society). University of Illinois Press. 1988. Pp. xix, 318. $24.95.Am Hist Rev. 1989(2):532-533.

2. American Medical Association. H-470.963: Boxing safety. Accessed September 26, 2021. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/boxing?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-4279.xml

3. The damaging punch.

4. Australian Medical Association. AMA position statement. Boxing: 1997–-reaffirmed 2007. Accessed September 26, 2021. https://ama.com.au/sites/default/files/documents/AMA_Position_Statement_on_Boxing_1997._Reaffirmed_2007.pdf

5. Phototherapy for Vitiligo

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3