Current Practices for Rehabilitation After Meniscus Repair: A Survey of Members of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus among sports medicine surgeons in North America on postoperative rehabilitation strategy after meniscus repair. Various meniscal tear types may necessitate a unique range of motion (ROM) and weightbearing rehabilitation protocol. Purpose: To assess the current landscape of how sports medicine practitioners in the American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) rehabilitate patients after the repair of varying meniscal tears. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A survey was distributed to 2973 AOSSM members by email. Participants reviewed arthroscopic images and brief patient history from 6 deidentified cases of meniscus repair—in cases 1 to 3, the tears retained hoop integrity (more stable repair), and in cases 4 to 6, the tear patterns represented a loss of hoop integrity. Cases were shuffled before the presentation. For each case, providers were asked at what postoperative time point they would permit (1) partial weightbearing (PWB), (2) full weightbearing (FWB), (3) full ROM, and (4) ROM allowed immediately after surgery. Results: In total, 451 surveys were completed (15.2% response). The times to PWB and FWB in cases 1 to 3 (median, 0 and 4 weeks, respectively) were significantly lower than those in cases 4 to 6 (median, 4 and 6 weeks, respectively) ( P < .001). In tears with retained hoop integrity, the median time to PWB was immediately after surgery, whereas in tears without hoop integrity, the median time to PWB was at 4 weeks postoperatively. Similarly, the median time to FWB in each tear with retained hoop integrity was 4 weeks after surgery, while it was 6 weeks in each tear without hoop integrity. However, regardless of tear type, most providers (67.1%) allowed 0° to 90° of ROM immediately after surgery and allowed full ROM at 6 weeks. Most providers (83.3%) braced the knee after repair regardless of hoop integrity and utilized synovial rasping/trephination with notch microfracture—a much lower proportion of providers utilized biologic augmentation (9%). Conclusion: Sports medicine practitioners in the AOSSM rehabilitated meniscal tears differently based on hoop integrity, with loss of hoop stresses triggering a more conservative approach. A majority braced and utilized in situ adjuncts for biological healing, while a minority added extrinsic biologics.