What Makes a 5-Star Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgeon? An Analysis of Positive Online Patient Reviews

Author:

Noel Morgan E.1,Kuttner Nicolas P.2,Lebaron Zachary3,Richman Evan H.4,Tummala Sailesh5,Brinkman Joseph C.5,Chhabra Anikar5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.

2. Department of Orthopedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

3. Department of Radiology, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

4. Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Abstract

Background: The increased focus on patient satisfaction has led to growth in the use of physician rating websites. Purpose: To analyze the factors associated with online 5-star patient reviews for orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 70 orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons were randomly selected from the AOSSM website. A search was performed for these surgeons on Yelp.com. All reviews other than 5 stars (of a possible 5 stars) were excluded from the study. Each review was categorized as referring to a surgical or nonsurgical aspect of care, and each comment within the review was categorized as being clinically or nonclinically related. Comments were further subcategorized by specific features such as bedside manner, clinical outcomes, and patient education. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Results: Overall, 400 five-star reviews were included in the study, comprising 1225 total positive comments. Of the 400 five-star reviews, 200 (50%) were from surgically treated patients, and 200 (50%) were from nonsurgically treated patients. Of the 1225 positive comments, 505 (41%) were clinically related, and 720 (59%) were nonclinical. The most common positive clinical comments were for clear treatment plans (191 reviews [48%]), good outcomes (173 reviews [43%]), and providing alternative treatment plans (55 reviews [14%]). The most common positive nonclinical comments were for good physician bedside manner (287 reviews [72%]), friendly/professional staff (194 reviews [49%]), and ease of scheduling (68 reviews [17%]). Conclusion: The majority of 5-star patient reviews left positive comments regarding nonclinical aspects of care such as physician bedside manner and friendly staff. The most common positive comments regarding clinical aspects concerned good outcomes and clear treatment plans. The overall most common positive comment, in both surgically and nonsurgically treated patients, referred to good bedside manner.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Sports medicine doctors. Accessed December 15, 2021. https://www.sportsmed.org/AOSSMIMIS/Members/Applications/Find_A_Doctor.aspx

2. Physician-Review Websites in Orthopaedic Surgery

3. Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction

4. Chowdhury A. What are the top doctor rating and review sites? Doctible. Published 2017. Accessed January 3, 2022. https://blog.doctible.com/what-are-the-top-doctor-rating-and-review-sites-20d32ba1ec81

5. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3