Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Aotearoa, New Zealand
Abstract
This article offers a critical analysis of the role of public health regulation on tertiary education in Aotearoa New Zealand and, specifically, the requirements and processes of Responsible Authorities under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act for the accreditation and monitoring of educational institutions and their curricula (degrees, courses of studies, or programmes). It identifies and discusses a number of issues concerned with the requirements of such accreditation and monitoring, including, administrative requirements and costs, structural requirements, and the implications for educational design. Concerns with the processes of these procedures, namely the lack of educational expertise on the part of the Responsible Authorities, and certain manifested power dynamics are also highlighted. Finally, the article draws conclusions for changing policy and practice.
Reference32 articles.
1. Australian and New Zealand Podiatry Accreditation Council (2015) Accreditation standards for podiatry programs for Australia and New Zealand. Available at: www.podiatristsboard.org.nz/Portals/0/Uploads/PBNZ.%20%20ANZPAC%20Podiatry%20Competency%20Standards%206.9.15.pdf?ver=2016-08-15-115752-873 (accessed 17 November 2020).
2. Bogossian F and Craven D (2020) A review of the requirements for interprofessional education and interprofessional collaboration in accreditation and practice standards for health professionals in Australia. Journal of interprofessional care 1-10.
3. Buffering the Stress of Programmatic Accreditation
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献