The persistence of bias in education: A call for research to move policy and practice from aspiration to results

Author:

Smith Jo1ORCID,Meyer Frauke1,McClure Heather2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

2. Center for Equity Promotion, College of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA

Abstract

While it seems the world has made significant social and political progress in the last 50 years by, for example, in many countries decriminalising homosexuality, ensuring greater freedom regarding gender identity, acknowledging women’s rights, or removing racist policies, in the last few years, the world seemed to have turned back into a direction that jeopardises the progress made. Educational institutions are often thought of as progressive spaces; however, the institutions themselves operate in a societal and political context that reflect beliefs – wrong or right – that societies hold. Education researchers and policymakers have attempted to conceptualise a response to address bias, but challenges remain. How policies that highlight the importance of inclusive learning environments, and a recognition and celebration of diversity translate into practice and whether the kind of change envisioned is actually taking place in classrooms and lecture theatres is not well documented. While studies have focussed on establishing the links between bias, teacher behaviour and student learning, few studies have documented effective and sustained efforts to dismantle bias in education. We take the stance in this paper that policies aimed at reducing bias can set parameters aimed at shifting practices, however, what is also needed are interventions at every level of the system to change biased beliefs of those implementing policies, leading in schools and teaching students in classrooms. However, typical professional development only highlights bias theoretically and is inadequate to change teachers’ beliefs. Without disrupting beliefs that perpetuate bias, policies remain aspirational, and intervention outcomes remain elusive. We know from decades of research that bias persists in educational systems, institutions and practices; what we need is research situated at the intersection of policy and practice so that we move from identifying inequities to documenting ways to address them.

Funder

Royal Society Te Apārangi

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3