Patient preferences for disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis therapy: a choice-based conjoint analysis

Author:

Utz Kathrin S.1,Hoog Jana2,Wentrup Andreas2,Berg Sebastian2,Lämmer Alexandra2,Jainsch Britta2,Waschbisch Anne2,Lee De-Hyung2,Linker Ralf A.2,Schenk Thomas2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

2. Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

Abstract

Objectives: With an increasing number of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS), patient preferences will gain importance in the decision-making process. We assessed patients’ implicit preferences for oral versus parenteral DMTs and identified factors influencing patients’ treatment preference. Methods: Patients with relapsing–remitting MS ( n = 156) completed a questionnaire assessing treatment preferences, whereby they had to decide between pairs of hypothetical treatment scenarios. Based on this questionnaire a choice-based conjoint analysis was conducted. Results: Treatment frequency and route of administration showed a stronger influence on patient preference compared with frequency of mild side effects. The latter attribute was more important for treatment-naïve patients compared with DMT-experienced patients. The higher the Extended Disability Status Scale score, the more likely pills, and the less likely fewer side effects were preferred. Pills were preferred over injections by 93% of patients, when treatment frequency and frequency of side effects were held constant. However, preference switched to injections when pills had to be taken three times daily and injections only once per week. Injections were also preferred when pills were associated with frequent side effects. Conclusions: Our results suggest that route of administration and treatment frequency play an important role in the patients’ preference for a given DMT.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3