Affiliation:
1. University of Tennessee–Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
Abstract
Langer found that the supply-side (locational) development policy increased income inequality in the American states, while demand-side (entrepreneurial) policy decreased inequality. Recent scholarship emphasizes the impact of unionization on state inequality. This analysis examines economic development policy and unionization in the same model. Using time series data (1983–2004) with an error correction model, it finds that entrepreneurial activism is associated with rising state inequality, while locational activism has no significant relationship. Additionally, entrepreneurial policy exerts a positive impact on inequality as union density rises, contrary to expectations. Skills-biased technical change is proposed to explain these findings.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Economic Development Policy;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2022
2. Chasing Disparity: Economic Development Incentives and Income Inequality in the U.S. States;State Politics & Policy Quarterly;2020-12
3. Economic Development Policy;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2018
4. Economic Development Policy;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2017