Measurement of prison social climate

Author:

Ross Michael W.1,Diamond Pamela M.1,Liebling Alison2,Saylor William G.3

Affiliation:

1. University of Texas, USA

2. University of Cambridge, UK

3. Federal Bureau of Prisons, US Department of Justice, USA

Abstract

We review and describe prison climate measurement studies. We compared the factor patterns and stability from three domains of the Prison Social Climate survey (PSC) (Environmental quality of life; Personal well-being; and Safety and security). Stability was compared using randomly split halves of inmate responses from 10 selected US federal prison samples ( n = 950): there were no significant differences. Factor patterns on the same instrument were compared between the US sample and an English purposive sample ( n = 186) of inmates. There were no significant differences between US and English factor patterns, although at a slightly lower level of factor constraint. Factors as factor-scored according to the US factor pattern showed significant differences between the USA and England on the Environmental quality of life scales and the Personal well-being scales, and significant differences on only two of six of the Safety and security dimensions. Data suggest that the PSC is stable within the US sample, and is also stable in its factor pattern between the US and English samples. Prison climate, as measured by the three domains of the PSC selected, appears a stable measure across similar western penal systems and inmate cultures.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference24 articles.

1. Bottoms, A.E. (2003) 'Theoretical reflections on the evaluation of a penal policy initiative', in L. Zedner and A. Ashworth (eds) The criminological foundations of penal policy: Essays in honor of Roger Hood, pp. 107-94. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

2. Bottoms, A.E. and P. Wiles (2002) 'Environmental criminology', in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminology, 3rd edn, pp. 620-56. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

3. Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled

Cited by 67 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3