How punitive is pretrial? Measuring the relative pains of pretrial detention

Author:

Anderson Claudia N.1ORCID,Cochran Joshua C.2,Montes Andrea N.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

2. School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

3. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

Abstract

The purpose of pretrial incarceration is not punishment. Yet, research demonstrates that pretrial detention elicits similar consequences as punishment. The goal of this study is to advance theory and policy discussions by enumerating the experiences and harms that emerge during pretrial detention and how closely they align with punishment. The analyses use the National Inmate Survey, 2011–2012 to compare the experiences of those held in pretrial detention to those incarcerated in jail or prison after a conviction. Individuals in pretrial detention report more disorderly environments than people in prisons, but also report more access to external social support and better views of staff legitimacy. The self-reported experiences of people in pretrial detention and those in jail as punishment are generally indistinguishable. The results provide considerable support for the argument that pretrial detention is inextricably punitive and, especially at its current scale, likely undermines system objectives of justice and public safety.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3