Abstract
This article aims to demonstrate that German and French Victim—Offender Mediation schemes (VOM), in contrary to mainstream opinion, do not seem to work but face enormous problems, which prevent the procedure from putting into practice its intended aims. In her qualitative study on VOM, the author evaluated the interaction process between participants and mediators from a micro-sociological point of view. Based on that evaluation, it is suggested that VOM is not able to put into practice its specific modus operandi within the framework of a penal procedure.
Subject
Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference39 articles.
1. Bannenberg, Britta (2001) `Die strafrechtliche mediation: Entstehungsgeschichte und juristische praxis', in F. Riklin (ed.) Mediation: Ein weg in der strafjustiz. médiation: une voie à suivre dans la justice pénale, pp. 58—75. Luzern: Caritas.
2. CONFLICTS AS PROPERTY*
3. Justice De Proximité - The Growth of ‘Houses of Justice’ and Victim/Offender Mediation in France: A Very Unfrench Legal Response?
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献