Abstract
Research on the measurement of crime seriousness, whether for statistical or research purposes, has generally defined “seriousness” exclusively in terms of the amount of harm actually inflicted, without consideration of the mental state or intentions of the actor. This has been justified on grounds of principle, on the basis of research findings, and for pragmatic reasons. It is posited here that none of these arguments is convincing. Society has a legitimate interest in measuring the amount of harm inflicted by crime, but a basic indicator of criminality must also take the mental element into account.
Subject
Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献