Lessons from Two Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Settings

Author:

Feder Lynette,Jolin Annette,Feyerherm William

Abstract

Experiments are known to be powerful tools in assessing the effectiveness of interventions. Notwithstanding this knowledge, randomized field trials have been little used in criminal justice settings. The researchers discuss their experiences implementing two experiments: one in a courthouse and the other in a police agency. Despite the different settings, common problems surfaced in both randomized field trials. The authors discuss obstacles faced in implementing and running experiments and suggest some strategies for avoiding these problems. It is the researchers' hope that such a candid discussion will help others to design and implement stronger experiments.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Arguments for and Against Adopting Evidence-Based Policing;Evidence-Based Policing;2022

2. What Is Evidence-Based Policing?;Evidence-Based Policing;2022

3. Randomized Experiments;Advanced Statistics in Criminology and Criminal Justice;2021-10-22

4. How effective are social engineering interventions? A meta-analysis;Information & Computer Security;2020-08-05

5. Criminal justice research: Incorporating a public health approach;Three Facets of Public Health and Paths to Improvements;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3