Author:
Boruch Robert,Snyder Brooke,DeMoya Dorothy
Abstract
This article lays out five standards for judging the importance of randomized field trials in estimating the relative effects of new programs and new variations on existing programs. These standards include contemporary evaluation policy, the historical development of trials in diverse sciences, ethics, normative practice, and the credibility of alternative approaches to estimating the effects of programs or variations. Empirical evidence and a line of reasoning bearing on each standard are made plain.
Subject
Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Cited by
53 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Arguments for and Against Adopting Evidence-Based Policing;Evidence-Based Policing;2022
2. What Is Evidence-Based Policing?;Evidence-Based Policing;2022
3. Future Directions in the Study of Displacement and Convergence Among Transnational Crime Flows;Sustainable Development Goals Series;2022
4. Randomized Experiments;Advanced Statistics in Criminology and Criminal Justice;2021-10-22
5. Randomized Controlled Trials;The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice;2021-08-20