Public Opinion Toward Diverse Types of Police Reform Post-2020: The Impact of Perceptions, Experiences, and Racial Resentment

Author:

Mancini Christina1ORCID,Metcalfe Christi2,Lehmann Robert Bradford1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA

2. University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA

Abstract

Prior scholarship has tapped public preferences toward policing policy. Still, there is a need to continue to monitor public opinion given recent events. Post George Floyd, several reforms have been proposed: accountability and oversight initiatives (e.g., citizen boards, mandatory reviews), diversion of funds away from policing, and/or greater funding for police. Theory and research suggest that sentiments regarding these reforms are likely divided and vary based on perceptions of and experiences with police, as well as racial resentment. Drawing on a 2021 national poll, this study examined public support for several diverse reforms. Broad approval was evident for most reforms. However, support was contingent on perceptions of and experiences with the police, racial resentment, and socio-demographic factors. Implications are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference93 articles.

1. Contact is a stronger predictor of attitudes toward police than race: a state-of-the-art review

2. Axios/Ipsos. (2021). Axios/Ipsos Hard Truths Civil Rights Poll: May 2021 [dataset]. Cornell University: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31118439

3. Racial resentment, crime concerns, and public attitudes toward defunding the police

4. Situational Trust: How Disadvantaged Mothers Reconceive Legal Cynicism

5. Blake A. (2014). Republicans and Democrats have vastly different views on race and police. But they agree on solutions. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/12/29/republicans-anddemocrats-have-vastly-different-views-on-race-and-police-but-they-agree-on-solutions/

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3