Teachers’ approaches to handling student errors in mathematics classes

Author:

Benecke Kirsten1,Kaiser Gabriele12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

2. Faculty of Arts and Teacher Education, Nord University, Bodø, Norway

Abstract

Empirical research has demonstrated that mathematical errors originate from various causes that may have different implications for the learning process. Mathematical errors are an international phenomenon as all teachers from different cultural background must handle them every day during teaching-and-learning processes. When errors arise, teachers must determine whether and how to deal with them and whether the error should be corrected. Although errors and how they are addressed by teachers are of high pedagogical importance, teachers’ approaches to handling student errors remain underexplored. The study reported herein examines the ways in which mathematics teachers handle student errors in various situations, and whether any connection between the error type and the manner in which it is corrected may be reconstructed. The study participants comprised 13 secondary mathematics teachers in a large city in northern Germany. Each teacher was video-recorded over two 90-min-lessons, and the data were subsequently evaluated using qualitative content analysis. The results indicate that teachers’ approaches to correcting mathematical student errors diverged considerably depending on the phase of the lesson during which the error occurred. In particular, during the class discussion phase, a high proportion of the corrections were performed by the students’ classmates, whereas corrections executed during the group work, partner work, or individual work phases were primarily performed by students who had made the errors and the teachers. Given that the teacher's approach to handling errors exerts a significant influence on teaching-and-learning processes, further research is required to identify the most prolific approaches to handling errors in order to foster students’ mathematical understanding.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference46 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3