Affiliation:
1. Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson), Toronto, ON, Canada
Abstract
This paper examines how the pandemic emergency as a global challenge – the first of its kind since WWII – has activated what I call a ‘pandemic nationalism’ that was simultaneously both inclusionary and exclusionary. On one hand, the national community was re-defined in relation to their common fate (of facing the pandemic together because residing in the same territory) extending hence the boundaries of membership to temporary residents or those with precarious status. On the other hand, it became increasingly closed towards the exterior enhancing what has been labelled ‘vaccine nationalism’ and a sense of being in competition with other nations on a common, global public good (notably vaccines and cures addressing the virus). Closures and exclusions arose also internally against those minorities that were associated with the ‘external threat’ notably people of east Asian origin. At the face of these contradictory developments, the question arises whether we could consider the Covid-19 pandemic as a turning point that signals a new phase of development of nationalism. Such nationalism is meant to respond to the increasing challenges of globalisation by incorporating those who serve the community while Othering those who are perceived to threaten its well-being.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Cultural Studies
Reference57 articles.
1. Aleinikoff AT (1995) The Tightening Circle of Membership, 22 Hastings Const. L.Q. 915. Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol22/iss4/1
2. Anderson B (1981) Imagined Communities. London: Verso, new revised edition 2016.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献