A Systematic Review of Assessments and Interventions for Chronic Pain in Young Children With or at High Risk for Cerebral Palsy

Author:

Letzkus Lisa1ORCID,Fehlings Darcy2,Ayala Lauren3,Byrne Rachel4,Gehred Alison5,Maitre Nathalie L.67ORCID,Noritz Garey6ORCID,Rosenberg Nathan S.6ORCID,Tanner Kelly8,Vargus-Adams Jilda9,Winter Sarah3,Lewandowski Dennis J.7,Novak Iona10

Affiliation:

1. Neurodevelopmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, UVA Children’s, Charlottesville, VA, USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

4. Cerebral Palsy Foundation, New York, NY, USA

5. Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Grant Morrow III Library, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

6. Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

7. Center for Perinatal Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

8. Division of Clinical Therapies, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

9. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

10. Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Background: Pain is common in children with cerebral palsy. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence regarding assessments and interventions for chronic pain in children aged ≤2 years with or at high risk for cerebral palsy. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Included articles were screened using PRISMA guidelines and quality of evidence was reviewed using best-evidence tools by independent reviewers. Using social media channels, an online survey was conducted to elicit parent preferences. Results: Six articles met criteria. Parent perception was an assessment option. Three pharmacologic interventions (gabapentin, medical cannabis, botulinum toxin type A) and 1 nonpharmacologic intervention were identified. Parent survey report parent-comfort and other nonpharmacologic interventions ranked as most preferable. Conclusion: A conditional GRADE recommendation was in favor of parent report for pain assessment. Clinical trials are sorely needed because of the lack of evidence for safety and efficacy of pharmacologic interventions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3