Impact of Motor Skills on Cognitive Test Results in Very-Low-Birthweight Children

Author:

Losch Heike1,Dammann Olaf2

Affiliation:

1. Neuroepidemiology Unit, Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

2. Neuroepidemiology Unit, Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, Perinatal Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Prenatal Medicine and General Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

Abstract

Standardized tests that are frequently used to evaluate the cognitive development of very-low-birthweight children often appear to measure motor ability as well as cognitive skills. To estimate the impact of motor skills on individual test performance among very-low-birthweight children of kindergarten age, we employed factor analysis in a sample of 298 very-low-birthweight children that included severely disabled children. Using a test battery designed to measure concentration, language skills, overall cognitive development, visuomotor abilities, and memory, we identified two factors in each of three diagnostic subgroups: unimpaired children (n = 184), clumsy children (n = 56), and children with cerebral palsy (n = 33). Based on the pattern of factor loadings, we interpret the first factor as capturing language and overall cognitive abilities, whereas the second factor appears to capture motor abilities. Language skills explained 49% and motor abilities accounted for 16% of the overall variance of the individual test results. Among children with attention deficit (n = 25), a third factor emerged. In these children, we interpret the first factor as capturing language or cognitive skills, the second as representing visuomotor skills, and the third as a quantifier of the ability to concentrate. The test battery tested the same abilities in impaired and unimpaired children; however, these were not always the abilities that the battery aimed to test. Future studies need to evaluate whether factor scores only for cognitive but not motor abilities might be useful outcome variables. (J Child Neurol 2004;19:318-322).

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3