Replacing Carbamazepine Slow-Release Tablets With Carbamazepine Suppositories: A Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Study in Children With Epilepsy
-
Published:1995-03
Issue:2
Volume:10
Page:114-117
-
ISSN:0883-0738
-
Container-title:Journal of Child Neurology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Child Neurol
Author:
Arvidsson Jan1, Nilsson Heimo L.2, Sandstedt Per3, Steinwall Gunilla1, Tonnby Bernt4, Flesch Gerard5
Affiliation:
1. Department of Paediatrics, County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping 2. Ciba-Geigy AB, Pharmaceuticals Division, Västra Frölunda 3. Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital, Linköping 4. Department of Paediatrics, County Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden 5. Ciba-Geigy Ltd, Pharma Division, Basel, Switzerland
Abstract
A suppository for rectal administration of carbamazepine has been developed for situations in which it is unsuitable to use the oral route of administration. In an open, controlled, within-patient study, the pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of carbamazepine slow-release tablets were compared with those of carbamazepine suppositories in children with epilepsy. The pharmacokinetic part of the study comprised 22 children, and an additional nine children were included in the clinical part of the study. Treatment with slow-release tablets was replaced for 7 days with carbamazepine suppositories in bioequivalent dosage. Clinical factors such as the rate of seizures and the local tolerability were studied, and an overall assessment of efficacy was made. In the pharmacokinetic part, 24-hour plasma concentration curves for carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide were recorded. The plasma concentration profiles (minimum, maximum, and mean concentrations, fluctuation index, and area under the curve) for carbamazepine and the other metabolites did not show any significant differences between oral and rectal administration when the suppository dose was increased by 25% compared to the tablets. No increase in seizure frequency was detected, and the overall assessment was very good to good in 25 of the 29 epileptic children. Increased flatulence during treatment with suppositories was noted in two children, one had anal irritation, and one had nausea/vomiting. Treatment with carbamazepine slow-release tablets in children with epilepsy can be replaced by carbamazepine suppositories in 25% higher dosage, with good clinical effect and appropriate pharmacokinetic values, when it is unsuitable to use the common oral route of administration. (J Child Neurol 1995; 10: 114-117).
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Subject
Clinical Neurology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference7 articles.
1. Porter RJ: Clinical efficacy and use of antiepileptic drugs, in Woodbury DM, Penry JK , Pippenger CE (eds): Antiepileptic Drugs. New York, Raven Press, 1982, pp 167-175. 2. Diurnal Variation of Carbamazepine and Carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide in Plasma and Saliva in Children With Epilepsy: A Comparison Between Conventional and Slow-Release Formulations 3. Johannessen SI , Henriksen O., Munthe-Kaas AW: Need for antiepileptic drug preparations other than oral, in Morselli PL, Pippenger CE, Penry JK (eds): Antiepileptic Drug Therapy in Pediatrics. New York, Raven Press, 1983, pp 339-347. 4. Johannessen SI , Henriksen O., Munthe-Kaas AW, Salvesen B.: Serum concentration profile studies of tablets and suppositories of valproate and carbamazepine in healthy subjects and patients with epilepsy, in Levy RH, Pitlick WH, Elchelbaum M , Meijer J (eds): Metabolism of Antiepileptic Drugs. New York , Raven Press, 1984, pp 61-71.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|