Affiliation:
1. Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio,
Abstract
Objective: To examine the evidence for and against the classification of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a valid disease entity, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition ( DSM-IV ), criteria. Data Sources: Sources included but were not limited to published literature on ADHD accessed via PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/). Study Selection: Peer-reviewed research, review articles, consensus statements, “white papers,” and proceedings of professional meetings were used. Data Extraction: Focused on evidence base and scientific validity of conclusions. Data Synthesis: Evidence for a genetic or neuroanatomic cause of ADHD is insufficient. Experimental work shows that executive function deficits do not explain ADHD. The psychometric properties of widely used ADHD rating scales do not meet standards expected for disease identification. Conclusions: ADHD is unlikely to exist as an identifiable disease. Inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity are symptoms of many underlying treatable medical, emotional, and psychosocial conditions affecting children.
Subject
Clinical Neurology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference141 articles.
1. Measurement of ADHD Outcomes: Implications for the Future
2. Prevalence, Recognition, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in a National Sample of US Children
3. Questioning the Treatment for ADHD
4. McGuiness D. Attention deficit disorder: the emperor's clothes, animal "pharm," and other fiction. In: Fisher S, Greenburg RP, eds. The Limits of Biological Treatments for Psychological Distress. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1989:151-187.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献