Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Does New Research Support Old Concepts?

Author:

Furman Lydia Mary1

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio,

Abstract

Objective: To examine the evidence for and against the classification of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a valid disease entity, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition ( DSM-IV ), criteria. Data Sources: Sources included but were not limited to published literature on ADHD accessed via PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/). Study Selection: Peer-reviewed research, review articles, consensus statements, “white papers,” and proceedings of professional meetings were used. Data Extraction: Focused on evidence base and scientific validity of conclusions. Data Synthesis: Evidence for a genetic or neuroanatomic cause of ADHD is insufficient. Experimental work shows that executive function deficits do not explain ADHD. The psychometric properties of widely used ADHD rating scales do not meet standards expected for disease identification. Conclusions: ADHD is unlikely to exist as an identifiable disease. Inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity are symptoms of many underlying treatable medical, emotional, and psychosocial conditions affecting children.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference141 articles.

1. Measurement of ADHD Outcomes: Implications for the Future

2. Prevalence, Recognition, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in a National Sample of US Children

3. Questioning the Treatment for ADHD

4. McGuiness D. Attention deficit disorder: the emperor's clothes, animal "pharm," and other fiction. In: Fisher S, Greenburg RP, eds. The Limits of Biological Treatments for Psychological Distress. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1989:151-187.

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3