Physicians’ Perspectives on Presurgical Discussion and Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Author:

Samanta Debopam1ORCID,Ostendorf Adam P2,Singh Rani3ORCID,Gedela Satyanarayana45,Elumalai Vimala6,Hoyt Megan Leigh6,Perry M. Scott7,Bartolini Luca8,Curran Geoffrey M9

Affiliation:

1. Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

2. Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University and Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

3. Department of Pediatrics, Atrium Health/Levine Children’s Hospital, Concord, NC, USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, Emory University College of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

5. Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA

6. Division of Neurology, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA

7. Justin Neurosciences Center, Cook Children’s Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA

8. Department of Pediatrics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

9. College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

Abstract

Objective: To qualitatively explore the approach of pediatric epilepsy providers when counseling regarding surgical options for epilepsy, presenting risks and benefits of surgery, overcoming resistance to surgery, and fostering shared decision making with patients and families. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with 11 academic clinicians (5- neurologists, 5- epileptologists, 1- neurosurgeon) from a Level 4 pediatric epilepsy center to explore how physicians communicate and pursue surgical decision-making. Results: A blended inductive-deductive analysis revealed three key themes (with subthemes) of presurgical discussions: (1) Candidate selection and initial discussion about epilepsy surgery (neurologists compared to epileptologists, the timing of the discussion, reluctant families) (2) Detailed individualized counseling about epilepsy surgery (shared decision-making [enablers and barriers] and risk-benefit analysis [balancing risks and benefits, statistical benefit estimation, discussion about SUDEP, prognostication about cognitive and behavioral outcomes, risks of surgery]) (3) Tools to improve decision-making (educational interventions for patients and families and provider- and organization-specific interventions). Significance: Presurgical discussions lack uniformity among physicians who treat epilepsy. Despite general interest in collaborative decision-making, experts raised concern about lack of exposure to communication training and clinical tools for optimizing decision-making, a high number of families who do not feel equipped to share the decision making leaving the decision-making entirely to the physician, and paucity of practical resources for individualized risk-benefit counseling. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed to reduce existing practice variations in presurgical counseling. Further consensus is needed about when and how to initiate the conversation about epilepsy surgery, essential components of the discussion, and the utility of various tools to improve the utilization of epilepsy surgery.

Funder

Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3