Abstract
Fullerand Rouse are both political social epistemologists concerned with the cognitive authority of science, though both disagree on what role it should play in science. Fullerar gues that political factors such as knowledge policy and a constitution play a primary role in the global legitimation of scientific knowledge, while Rouse holds that politics play a role on the local (practices) level but not on the global (metascientific) level of legitimation. While Fullerpr ovides a political response to the legitimation project, Rouse rejects the legitimation project because he holds that it involves the need forglobal legitimation of the place of scientific knowledge in our culture.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Philosophy
Reference13 articles.
1. Fuller's Civic Republicanism and the Question of Scientific Expertise
2. Fuller, Steve.1991. Studying the proprietary grounds of knowledge. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6:105-128.
3. Fuller, Steve. 1996. Recent work in social epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly 33 (2): 149-166.
4. Epistemology in your face
5. Galison, Peter. 1988. History, philosophy, and the central metaphor. Science in Context 2:200-2001.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献