Affiliation:
1. Hertie School, Berlin’s University of Governance, Germany
2. University of Parma, Italy
Abstract
This article discusses the risks that artificial intelligence (AI) poses for work. It classifies risks into two types, direct and indirect. Direct risks are AI-induced forms of discrimination, surveillance and information asymmetries at work. Indirect risks are enhanced workplace automation and the increasing ‘fissurisation’ of work. Direct and indirect risks are illustrated using the example of the transport and logistics sector. We discuss policy responses to both types of risk in the context of the German economy and argue that the policy solutions need to differ according to the type of risk. Direct risks can be addressed by European and national regulation against discrimination, surveillance and information asymmetries. As for indirect risks, the first step is to monitor the risks so as to gain an understanding of sector-specific transformations and establish relevant expertise and competence. This way of addressing AI-induced risks at work will help to improve the prospects of decent work, fair remuneration and adequate social protection for all.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference85 articles.
1. Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction
2. Algorithm Watch (2019) Atlas of Automation – Automated Decision-Making and Participation in Germany. AW Algorithmwatch Gmbh. Available at: https://atlas.algorithmwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Atlas_of_Automation_by_AlgorithmWatch.pdf (accessed 10 June 2020).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献