Hospital utilization of laboratory tests, procedures, and special therapies

Author:

Smith Shirley Ann Newell1,Veglia Jeanne M.2

Affiliation:

1. Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.

2. Inpatient Hospice, Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

Abstract

One area ofhospice which would reflect both cost containment and integrity of palliative philosophy would be the volume of lab tests, procedures, and special therapies utilized. One major study found that in most areas, including utilization, there were no differences between hospice and non-hospice, and yet there is much in the literature about hospice savings due to diagnostic tests and life saving proceduresnot being done. The purpose of this study was to compare the utilization patterns betweenhospiceand non-hospice subjects in the same setting. It wasa retrospective study utilizing the medical records of hospice (n= 53) and non-hospice (n= 50) terminalcancer patients over a one year period. Though not randomized, it was found the two groups were closely matched by age, care days, number of subjects, and diagnosis. The hospice group had significantly less utilization (p .001) in all of the three categories being evaluated. The mean number of diagnostic tests for hospice patients was .94 and forthe non-hospice, 34.98. All ofthe non-hospice patients had at least one test performed while 75.5 percent of the hospice patients had no tests. Further studies are needed to define cost effectiveness, and others to compare level of utilization to quality of life.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference11 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Clinical Pathology Differences in Laboratory Utilization in Hospice and Nonhospice Units;American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®;2009-01-14

2. The impact of a hospice consultation team on the care of veterans with advanced cancer;Journal of Pain and Symptom Management;1996-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3