Pilot Study of an Interprofessional Palliative Care Curriculum: Course Content and Participant-Reported Learning Gains

Author:

Starks Helene12ORCID,Coats Heather3,Paganelli Tia3,Mauksch Larry2,van Schaik Eileen3,Lindhorst Taryn4,Hurd Caroline5,Doorenbos Ardith136

Affiliation:

1. Department of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

2. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

3. Department of Biobehavioral Nursing & Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

4. School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

5. Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

6. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Abstract

Context: The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend that palliative care clinicians work together as interprofessional teams. We created and piloted a 9-month curriculum that focused on 3 related domains: (1) patient-centered, narrative communication skills; (2) interprofessional team practice; and (3) metrics and systems integration. The multifaceted curriculum was delivered through 16 webinars, 8 online modules, 4 in-person workshops, reflective skill practice, written reflections, and small group online discussions. Objectives: Report evaluations of the course content and skill self-assessments from 24 interprofessional palliative care clinicians. Methods: Participants rated each learning activity and completed a retrospective pre–post test skill assessment. Learning gains were measured as the difference in the percentage of participants reporting “strong” or “highly competent” skill levels at baseline and the end of the course. Participants also provided examples of how they used the skills in practice. Results: Participants achieved an average learning gain of 50% across all domains, and in each domain communication (54%), interprofessional team practice (52%), and metrics and systems integration (34%). They also gave high ratings for the curriculum content (overall mean [standard deviation] rating of 5.5 (0.7) out of 6). Examples of practice impacts included improved skills in responding to emotions, understanding the equal importance of all professions on their team and incorporating different perspectives into their practice, and learning about outcome measurement in palliative care. Conclusion: This curriculum demonstrated success in increasing perceived skills for interprofessional palliative care clinicians in advanced communication, team practice, and metrics and system integration.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3