Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
2. Faculty of Law, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
3. Editor in Chief of Italian Journal of Palliative Care (Riv. It. Cure Palliative), Milano, Italy
Abstract
Context Palliative Care (PC) and Medically Assisted Death (MAD), specifically assisted suicide and euthanasia, are distinct practices characterized by differing objectives, methods, implementation and outcomes. Representatives of PC, including scientific societies or physicians, may, in certain cases, adopt a critical stance towards MAD. Objectives The study aims to explore the underlying reasons for such opposition. Methods To this end, the philosophical underpinnings and legal conditions of PC and MAD will be analyzed. Results The ethical and philosophical landscape of PC and MAD leads us to identify, on one hand, the Hippocratic paradigm and, on the other hand, what we call Socratic medicine. From a legal analysis perspective, the presence of intolerable suffering serves as a common ground between the two practices, albeit risking being the subject of misunderstandings and instrumental objections. Conclusion Preventing an instrumental use of PC in relation to MAD is crucial to enable the respect and the coexistence of the two practices.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献