Resident and Caregiver Dyads Talk About Death and Dying in Assisted Living: A Typology of Communication Behaviors

Author:

Vandenberg Ann E.1ORCID,Bender Alexis A.1ORCID,Kemp Candace L.2ORCID,Perkins Molly M.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

2. Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

3. Birmingham/Atlanta VA Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA

Abstract

Background In the U.S., assisted living (AL) is increasingly a site of death, and anxiety about dying has been identified in long-term care residents and their caregivers. Communication about death and dying is associated with better quality of life and care at end of life (EOL). Objective To understand communication behaviors used by AL residents and their informal caregivers (i.e., family members or friends) related to death and dying, and address communication needs or opportunities applicable to EOL care in AL. Design A thematic analysis of in-depth interviews and fieldnotes from a subsample of data from a 5-year NIA-funded study. Setting/Subjects Participants included 15 resident-caregiver dyads from three diverse AL communities in Atlanta, Georgia in the U.S. Measurements Interview transcripts were coded for communication behavior. Concordances and discordances within dyads were examined. Results We identified a typology of four dyadic communication behaviors: Talking (i.e., both partners were talking with each other about death), Blocking (i.e., one partner wanted to talk about death but the other did not), Avoiding (i.e., each partner perceived that the other did not want to communicate about death), and Unable (i.e., dyads could not communicate about death because of interpersonal barriers). Conclusions Older residents in AL often want to talk about death but are blocked from doing so by an informal caregiver. Caregivers and AL residents may benefit from training in death communication. Recommendations for improving advance care planning and promoting better EOL communication includes timing these conversations before the opportunity is lost.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3