Audit tools for palliative care services: Identification of neglected aspects of care

Author:

Charlton Rodger1,Smith Gary2,White David3,Austin Carol4,Pitts Marian5

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Primary Health Care, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

2. University of Birmingham, Hampton-in-Arden, Solihull, West Midlands, United Kingdom

3. Centre for Health Psychology, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom

4. Centre for Health Psychology, School of Sciences, Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom

5. Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which audit of palliative care service occurs nationally in Britain and Ireland. The following items were measured: (1) audit tools employed, (2) aspects of services undergoing audit, (3) changes in practice as a result of audit, and (4) obstacles to conducting some aspects of the audit. Audit practices were surveyed by means of a postal questionnaire distributed to managers of all hospice and palliative care services in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. A 10 percent sample of managers (n = 40) who responded were subsequently interviewed to confirm and elaborate on questionnaire responses. The response rate was 60 percent and was highest for hospices at 68 percent. Of the respondents, 73 percent audit their services. Of those who audit their services, 79 percent changed their service as a result. Although physical aspects of care were audited frequently (61 percent), other core aspects of palliative care that rarely were audited included bereavement care (17 percent), training (13 percent), and psychological and spiritual care (12 percent). Managers indicated that some aspects of care were rarely audited because they considered clinical and organizational aspects of palliative care to be more important. They also stated that they did not have enough time, expertise, or adequate measurement tools. Until the neglected features of palliative care are audited, the full effectiveness of the services remains unknown.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3