Practice patterns of hospice medical directors in a Midwestern state

Author:

Parker-Oliver Debra1

Affiliation:

1. University of Missouri, School of Rural Sociology; Community Hospices of America, Columbia, Missouri

Abstract

This study of hospice medical directors was conducted in a Midwestern state with the help of the state hospice organization in the summer of 1998. The hospice programs in this state were young and relatively small. While having practiced medicine for many years, the majority of hospice medical directors had been affiliated with a hospice program for less than five years. The programs reported little orientation or continuing education for their physician leaders. Pain management practices were analyzed and compared with practice standards in the hospice pain management literature. Attitudes on the scheduled dosing of opioids, use of adjuvant medications for bone pain, the assessment of pain by the patient, and physician comfort with high doses of morphine are consistent with suggested standards and attitudes in the literature. Practice patterns that differed with the literature included choice of drugs, routes of administration, and dosing issues. Opportunities exist to improve care and lower cost.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hospice Medical Directors: A Survey of One State;Journal of the American Medical Directors Association;2012-01

2. Sharing atrocity stories in hospice: a study of niceness message strategies in interdisciplinary team meetings;Progress in Palliative Care;2011-07

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The Voices of Hospice Medical Directors;American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®;2010-05-03

4. The Role of the Hospice Medical Director as Observed in Interdisciplinary Team Case Reviews;Journal of Palliative Medicine;2010-03

5. A Guide to Becoming a Hospice Medical Director: Initial Decisions and Evaluations;Journal of the American Medical Directors Association;2009-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3