Dangerous Variation or Patient-Centered Care? Palliative Care and Pain Providers’ Comfort, Experiences, and Approaches when Treating Cancer Pain With Coexisting Aberrant Behaviors

Author:

Hadler Rachel A.12ORCID,Klinedinst Rachel3,Jones Christopher A.4,Bao Yuhua5,Pathak Ravi16,Zarrabi Ali J.6,Rosa William E.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

2. Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

3. Palliative Care Alliance, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

4. Palliative Care Program, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

5. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

6. Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

7. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Background Patients with cancer-related pain are at high risk for aberrant drug use behaviors (ADB), including self-escalation, diversion and concurrent illicit substance or opioid misuse; however, limited evidence is available to guide opioid prescribing for patients with life-limiting illness and concurrent or suspected ADB. We sought to characterize how specialists evaluate for and manage these high-risk behaviors in patients with cancer-related pain. Methods We conducted telephonic semi-structured interviews with palliative care and pain medicine providers. Participants discussed their own comfort and experience level with identifying and managing ADB in patients with life-limiting illness. They were subsequently presented with a series of standardized scenarios and asked to describe their concerns and management strategies. Results 95 interdisciplinary pain and palliative care specialists were contacted; 37 agreed to participate (38.9%). Analysis of interview contents revealed several central themes: (1) widespread discomfort and anxiety regarding safe and compassionate opioid prescribing for high-risk patients, (2) belief that widely used risk-mitigation tools such as opioid contracts and urine drug screens provided inadequate support for decision-making, and (3) lack of institutional and organizational support and guidance for safe prescribing strategies. Most clinicians reported self-education regarding addiction and alternative prescribing/pain management strategies. Providers varied widely in their willingness to discontinue opioid prescribing in a patient with aberrant behavior and pain associated with life-limiting illness. Conclusion Providers caring for patients demonstrating ADB and cancer-related pain struggle to balance safe prescribing with symptom management. Increased guidance is needed regarding opioid prescribing, monitoring, and discontinuation in high-risk patients.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

American Cancer Society

National Palliative Care Research Center

Cambia Health Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3