Family Caregivers’ Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event

Author:

Schubart Jane R.123,Reading Jean M.4,Penrod Janice5,Stewart Renee R.6,Sampath Ramya7,Lehmann Lisa S.789,Levi Benjamin H.610,Green Michael J.36

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

2. Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

3. Department of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

4. Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA

5. College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

6. Department of Humanities, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

7. Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

8. National Center for Ethics in Health Care Veterans Health, Washington, DC, USA

9. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

10. Department of Pediatrics, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to benefit patients and families, yet little is known about how an ACP event impacts communication and conversation about end-of-life treatment wishes and the content of such conversations between patients and family caregivers. Objective: To characterize post-ACP conversations regarding medical wishes between seriously ill patients and their family caregivers. Participants: Patients with advanced illness and family caregivers. Outcome Measured: Post-ACP conversations. Design: As part of a larger randomized controlled trial, dyads consisting of seriously ill patients and their identified family caregiver engaged in ACP and created an advance directive for the patient. Approximately 4 to 6 weeks later, semistructured interviews were conducted with the family caregivers to elucidate the subsequent communications regarding medical wishes. If the dyad did not have any conversations post-ACP, reasons and barriers were explored. Results: The majority of dyads (131/188, 69.7%) had 2 to 3 conversations lasting 3 to 5 minutes each in the weeks immediately following ACP. These conversations most commonly addressed general patient wishes about quality of life and specific medical treatments. The most common reasons for not having conversations were a general discomfort with the topic (13/57, 22.8%) and previously having discussed medical wishes (16/57, 28.1%). Conclusion: The ACP events promote conversation regarding quality of life, general wishes at the end of life, and specific medical wishes. Barriers to conversation following ACP were similar to barriers to ACP in general, suggesting that a more intentional focus on addressing these barriers pre- and post-ACP may be necessary to improve communication.

Funder

American Cancer Society

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3