Frailty Recognition by Clinicians and its Impact on Advance Care Planning

Author:

Queisi Munther M.1ORCID,Atallah-Yunes Suheil Albert1,Adamali Farah1,Jonnalagadda Nageshwar1,Rastegar Vida2,Brennan Maura J.3,Kapoor Alok45,Stefan Mihaela S.16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School–Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA

2. Baystate Medical Center Office of Research, Springfield, MA, USA

3. Department of Geriatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School–Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA

4. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

5. University of Massachusetts Memorial Healthcare, Worcester, MA, USA

6. Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School–Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA

Abstract

Background: Frailty has important implications for the care of the elderly and how their needs are met. Objective: To assess clinicians’ acknowledgement of frailty in the electronic medical records (EMR) and the impact of frailty recognition on advance care planning (ACP). Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 119 patients 65 years or older with moderate or severe frailty assessed using a validated frailty scale. We reviewed notes to determine if primary team identified frailty and obtained data regarding ACP planning. We present the characteristics and outcomes of patients who were identified as frail and compared them with patients whose frailty was unrecognized in EMR. Results: Among the 119 frail patients, one third were ≥85 years and one-year mortality was 25.4%. Most patients were taking ≥5 medications and only 14.3% rated their health as excellent or good prior to hospitalization. Only 15 patients (12.6%) were identified as frail in the EMR. The only significant differences between those recognized versus unrecognized frail were body mass index (23.4 vs 28.6, p = 0.02) and reported weight loss in the 3 months prior to admission (93.3% vs 59.6%, p = 0.009). Geriatric or palliative care consults, and changes in code status to do-not resuscitate were more frequent among those recognized vs not. (33.3% vs 11.5%; 13.3% vs 1.9% respectively). Conclusion: Documentation of frailty in the EMR was rare and it was associated with a lower likelihood of providing advance care planning. These findings suggest a need for consistent frailty assessment, which might promote patient-centered care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3