Advance Care Planning Shared Decision-Making Tools for Non-Cancer Chronic Serious Illness: A Mixed Method Systematic Review

Author:

Sloan Danetta H.1ORCID,Hannum Susan M.1,DeGroot Lyndsay2,Dy Sydney M.3,Waldfogel Julie4,Chyr Linda C.3,Heughan JaAlah-Ai3,Zhang Allen3,Wilson Renee F.3,Yuan Christina T.5,Wu David S.6,Robinson Karen A.5,Cotter Valerie T.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

2. Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA

3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

4. Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA

5. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

6. Palliative Care Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract

Context: Shared decision-making tools can facilitate advance care planning and goals of care conversations in non-cancer serious illness. More information on integrating these tools in ambulatory care could better support clinicians and patients/caregivers in these conversations. Objectives: We evaluated effectiveness and implementation of integrating palliative care shared decision-making tools into ambulatory care for U.S. adults with serious, life-threatening illness and their caregivers. Data sources: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2000 - May 2020) for quantitative controlled, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Review methods: Two reviewers screened articles, abstracted data, and independently assessed risk of bias or study quality. For quantitative trials, we graded strength of evidence for key outcomes: patient/caregiver satisfaction, depression or anxiety, concordance between patient preferences for care and care received, and healthcare utilization, including advance directive documentation. Results: We included 6 quantitative effectiveness randomized, controlled trials and 5 qualitative implementation studies across primary care and specialty populations. Shared decision-making tools all addressed goals-of-care communication or advance care planning. Palliative care shared decision-making tools may be effective for improving patient satisfaction with communication and advance directive documentation. We were unable to draw conclusions about concordance between preferences and care received. Patients and caregivers preferred advance care planning discussions grounded in patient and caregiver experiences with individualized timing. Conclusions: For non-cancer serious illness, advance care planning shared decision-making tools may improve several outcomes. Future trials should evaluate concordance with care received and other health care utilization. Key Message: This mixed-methods review concludes that when integrating palliative care into ambulatory care for serious illness and conditions other than cancer, advance care planning shared decision-making tools may improve patient satisfaction and advance directive documentation.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference1 articles.

1. Dy SM, Waldfogel JM, Sloan DH, et al. Integrating palliative care in ambulatory care of non-cancer serious chronic illness. The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center. In Press; pp. 1–87.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3