Implementation Costs of Technology-Enhanced Transitional Palliative Care for Rural Caregivers

Author:

Kaufman Brystana G.123ORCID,Holland Diane E.4,Vanderboom Catherine E.4,Ingram Cory5,Wild Ellen M.6,Dose Ann Marie4,Stiles Carole4,Gustavson Allison M.78,Chun Alice2,Langan Erica M.2,Baer-Benson Henry A.4,Mandrekar Jay9,Griffin Joan M.410

Affiliation:

1. Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham NC, USA

2. Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham NC, USA

3. Durham VA HSR&D

4. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

5. Department of Community Internal Medicine Geriatrics, Palliative Care Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

6. Department of Palliative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

7. Center for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA

8. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

9. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

10. Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Abstract

Objectives Compared to urban family caregivers (FCG), rural FCG experience greater burdens accessing coordinated care for their loved ones during and after hospitalization. The impact of technology-enhanced transitional palliative care (TPC) on caregiver outcomes is currently being evaluated in a randomized control trial. This study evaluates resource use and health system costs of this FCG-focused TPC intervention and potential Medicare reimbursement mechanisms. Methods Rural caregivers of hospitalized patients were randomized into an 8-week intervention consisting of video visits conducted by a registered nurse certified in palliative care, supplemented with phone calls and texts (n = 215), or attentional control. Labor costs were estimated for a registered nurse and compared to scenario analyses using a nurse practitioner or social worker wages. Medicare reimbursement scenarios included Transitional Care Management (TCM) and Chronic Care Management (CCM) CPT codes. Results In the base case, TPC cost was $395 per FCG facilitated by a registered nurse, compared to $337 and $585 if facilitated by a social worker or nurse practitioner, respectively. Mean Medicare reimbursement in the TCM-only scenario was $322 and $260 for high or moderate complexity patients, respectively. Reimbursement in the CCM only scenario was $348 and $274 for complex and non-complex patients, respectively. Reimbursement in the TCM+CCM scenario was $496 and $397, for high/complex and moderate/non-complex patients, respectively. Conclusion TPC is a feasible, low cost and sustainable strategy to enhance FCG support in rural areas. Potential reimbursement mechanisms are available to offset the costs to the health system for providing transitional palliative care to caregivers of patients recently hospitalized.

Funder

National Institute of Nursing Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference24 articles.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3