Withdrawal of Artificial Nutrition

Author:

Leheup Benoît F.1,Piot Elise1,Goetz Christophe2,Quilliot Didier3,Niemier Jean-Yves4,Wary Bernard1,Ducrocq Xavier5

Affiliation:

1. Palliative Care Department, Metz-Thionville Regional Hospital, Metz, France

2. Clinical Research Support Unit, Metz-Thionville Regional Hospital, Metz, France

3. Nutrition Department, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France

4. Geriatrics Department, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France

5. Department of Neurology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France

Abstract

Context: In spite of the existence of clinical guidelines and a legal framework in France, the withdrawal of artificial nutrition (AN) in palliative care remains a difficult situation for caregivers who are confronted with this reality. Objectives: To describe the perception of caregivers on the withdrawal of AN and to compare this perception between caregivers who have already been confronted with this situation and those who have not. Methods: Cross-sectional survey questionnaire of nurses and nurses’ aides (n = 274) working in medicine, surgery, and palliative care departments of a regional hospital. Results: Of the caregivers, 59.5% declared having been confronted with the withdrawal of AN in their professional practice. This was associated with a better perception by these caregivers even if their knowledge on the criteria to be considered in the decision was not significantly modified. Conclusion: The coherence of the withdrawal of AN with the personal beliefs of the caregivers, already high in the absence of being confronted with this practice, is better among caregivers who have been confronted with this situation. The lack of information perceived by caregivers should prompt us to develop additional training on the withdrawal of AN, its objectives, and its clinical consequences.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3