Correlation and Agreement Between the CO2 Gap Obtained From Peripheral Venous Blood and From Mixed Venous Blood in Mechanically Ventilated Septic Patients

Author:

Orso Daniele1ORCID,Molinari Chiara1,Bacchetti Giacomo1,Zanini Victor1,Montanar Valentina1,Copetti Roberto2,Guglielmo Nicola2,Bove Tiziana1

Affiliation:

1. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Department, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine and Department of Medical Science (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Community Hospital of Latisana, Latisana, Italy

Abstract

Background Venous-arterial CO2 difference (Pv-aCO2) is a valuable marker that can identify a subset of patients in shock with inadequate cardiac output to meet tissue metabolic requirements. Some authors have found that Pv-aCO2 levels calculated from mixed vs central venous blood demonstrate a linear relationship. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a linear relationship between Pv-aCO2 obtained with peripheral venous blood (Pv-aCO2p) and with mixed venous blood, and the agreement between the 2 measures. Methods This was a prospective, single-center, observational clinical study enrolling mechanically ventilated patients in septic shock during the first 24 hours following admission to the intensive care unit. Results The Bravais–Pearson r-coefficient between Pv-aCO2 and Pv-aCO2p was .70 in 38 determinations (95%CI .48-.83; P-value = 1.25 x 10^-6). The Bland–Altman bias was 4.11 mmHg (95%CI 2.82–5.39), and the repeatability coefficient was 11.05. Using the Taffe approach, the differential and proportional biases were 2.81 (95%CI .52–5.11) and 1.29 (95%CI .86–1.72), respectively. Conclusion There was linear correlation between Pv-aCO2p and Pv-aCO2 in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock. The bias showed a gradual increase in high Pv-aCO2 values in an upward trend.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Understanding Physiology and Using Technology to Care for Challenging Patients;Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2024-02-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3