Native Whole Blood (TRUE-NATEM) and Recalcified Citrated Blood (NATEM) Reference Value Validation with ROTEM Delta

Author:

Yoon Uzung1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: Thromboelastography is a viscoelastic test of whole blood hemostasis. Currently, no reference value exists for native whole blood and recalcified citrated blood without activators. The aim of this study was to compare the results of ROTEM® tests using fresh native blood without decalcification “TRUE-NATEM” with those using decalcified citrated blood “NATEM” and provide reference values for each. Methods: Inclusion criteria were healthy adult volunteers (18–65 years). Exclusion criteria were any medical condition or medication affecting coagulation. Native whole blood testing was defined as “TRUE-NATEM-test.” For recalcified citrated blood testing, the NATEM function was used on ROTEM®. Result: The reference value for TRUE-NATEM was CT: 872-1595s, A10: 14-34 mm, A20: 26-48 mm, CFT: 314-839s, MCF: 34-55 mm, and alpha angle: 17-40°. The reference value for NATEM was CT: 757-1327s, A10: 19-43 mm, A20: 33-55 mm, CFT: 219-615s, MCF: 37-61 mm, alpha angle: 24-51°, and ML: 0-3%. When comparing the reference value of NATEM to TRUE-NATEM, the CT and CFT values are decreased and the MCF and alpha angle are increased. The recalcification process of citrated blood in NATEM shows significant activation of coagulation. Female healthy volunteers had enhanced coagulation when activators were used. Age-related statistical difference was seen when activators were used. Ethnicity did not show any difference on the ROTEM values. Conclusion: We determined the reference value for native whole blood and recalcified whole blood using ROTEM®. A significant discrepancy in native whole blood and recalcified citrated blood coagulation was found. Our study underlines the importance of native whole blood as the gold standard reference value in coagulation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Embracing Scrutiny: The Importance of Critical Evaluation and Transparency in Research;Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2023-07-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3