Affiliation:
1. École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences Lettres, Paris, France
Abstract
In 1979, the Council of the European Communities declared its intention to ban battery cages for laying hens; one year later, everything about the ban is forgotten. During this preparatory year (1979-1980), all that happened is the publication of scientific reports, that is, attempts at producing knowledge as a basis for and justification of the ban decision. This paper aims at understanding to what extent ignorance and doubt were produced instead. By examining the reports, I demonstrate that there are three interrelated levels of ignorance production: (1) the missions given by the Commission to scientists were ambiguous, (2) questions inherent to animal welfare sciences, such as the significant variability of their measures and results, lead to a systematic standardization, and (3) the battery cage works as a techno-scientific promise and an “obligatory passage point” where scientists and industry meet. Disciplinary identity issues therefore lead scientists to adopt a double standard about the welfare of laying hens.
Subject
Human-Computer Interaction,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Anthropology
Reference94 articles.
1. Species of Mind
2. Modification of laying hen cages to improve behavior
3. Moral Struggles in Markets
4. Bedessem Baptiste. 2018. “Quelle Autonomie Pour La Recherche? Analyse Épistémologique Des Conditions de La Gouvernance Des Sciences.” PhD diss. Montréal, Canada: Université du Québec À Montréal (UQAM)-Université Grenoble Alpes.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献