A Framework for Analyzing Dialogues over the Acceptability of Controversial Technologies

Author:

Wolfe Amy K.1,Bjornstad David J.1,Russell Milton2,Kerchner Nichole D.2

Affiliation:

1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory

2. University of Tennessee

Abstract

This article asks under what circumstances controversial technologies would be considered seriously for remediation instead of being rejected out of hand. To address this question, the authors developed a conceptual framework called public acceptability of controversial technologies (PACT). PACT considers site-specific, decision-oriented dialogues among the individuals and groups involved in selecting or recommending hazardous waste remediation technologies. It distinguishes technology acceptability, that is, a willingness to consider seriously, from technology acceptance, the decision to deploy. The framework integrates four dimensions: (1) an acceptability continuum that underlies decision-oriented dialogues among individuals and constituency groups, (2) the attributes of these individuals and groups, (3) the attributes of the technology at issue, and (4) the community context—social, institutional, and physical. This article describes and explores PACT as a tool for understanding and better predicting the acceptability of controversial technologies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Human-Computer Interaction,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Anthropology

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Facial Recognition Interaction in a University Setting: Impression, Reaction, and Decision-Making;Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future;2022

2. The role of perceived legitimacy in understanding traffic rule compliance: A scoping review;Accident Analysis & Prevention;2021-09

3. Emotions, values and technology: illuminating the blind spots;Journal of Responsible Innovation;2020-04-02

4. The Role and Functions of Community Benefit Schemes;Energiepolitik und Klimaschutz. Energy Policy and Climate Protection;2019

5. Participation in Environmental Decision-making: Reflecting on Planning and Community Benefits for Major Wind Farms;Journal of Environmental Law;2016-10-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3