Power Dynamics in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Multiple–Case Study Analysis of Partnering Contexts, Histories, and Practices

Author:

Wallerstein Nina1ORCID,Muhammad Michael2,Sanchez-Youngman Shannon1,Rodriguez Espinosa Patricia3,Avila Magdalena1,Baker Elizabeth A.4,Barnett Steven5,Belone Lorenda1,Golub Maxine6,Lucero Julie7ORCID,Mahdi Ihsan8,Noyes Emma9,Nguyen Tung10,Roubideaux Yvette11,Sigo Robin12,Duran Bonnie13

Affiliation:

1. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

2. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

3. Stanford University, School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA

4. Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA

5. University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

6. Institute for Family Health, New York, NY, USA

7. University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA

8. New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe, NM, USA

9. Washington State University–Spokane, WA, USA

10. University of California San Francisco, CA, USA

11. National Congress on American Indians Policy Research Center, Washington, DC, USA

12. Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA, USA

13. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Abstract

Community-based participatory research has a long-term commitment to principles of equity and justice with decades of research showcasing the added value of power-sharing and participatory involvement of community members for achieving health, community capacity, policy, and social justice outcomes. Missing, however, has been a clear articulation of how power operates within partnership practices and the impact of these practices on outcomes. The National Institutes of Health–funded Research for Improved Health study (2009-2013), having surveyed 200 partnerships, then conducted seven in-depth case studies to better understand which partnership practices can best build from community histories of organizing to address inequities. The diverse case studies represented multiple ethnic–racial and other marginalized populations, health issues, and urban and rural areas and regions. Cross-cutting analyses of the qualitative results focus on how oppressive and emancipatory forms of power operate within partnerships in response to oppressive conditions or emancipatory histories of advocacy within communities. The analysis of power was conducted within each of the four domains of the community-based participatory research conceptual model, starting from how contexts shape partnering processes to impact short-term intervention and research outputs, and contribute to outcomes. Similarities and differences in how partnerships leveraged and addressed their unique contexts and histories are presented, with both structural and relational practices that intentionally addressed power relations. These results demonstrate how community members draw from their resilience and strengths to combat histories of injustice and oppression, using partnership principles and practices toward multilevel outcomes that honor community knowledge and leadership, and seek shared power, policy, and community transformation changes, thereby advancing health equity.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3