Affiliation:
1. Bowling Green State University, OH, USA
2. Shanghai International Studies University, China
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between selective and cross-cutting/non-partisan media exposure, perceived journalism framing, and U.S. public’s perception of China and the United States during the U.S.–China trade dispute. A national survey of U.S. adult population indicated that more people perceived that the media escalated the conflict between China and the United States than promoted peace between the countries. Perceived peace journalism framing was positively related to perception of China, whereas perceived war journalism framing was positively related to perception of the United States. Partisan media use has higher influence on perception of the United States than perception of China.
Funder
national social science fund of china
Reference64 articles.
1. Amadeo K. (2021, April 30). U.S. Trade deficit with China and why it’s so high. The Balance. https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-china-trade-deficit-causes-effects-and-solutions-3306277
2. Aruguete N., Calvo E. (2018). Time to# protest: Selective exposure, cascading activation, and framing in social media. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy007
3. Asker D., Dinas E. (2019). Thinking fast and furious: Emotional intensity and opinion polarization in online media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz042
4. Baron D. P. (2006). Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 90(1–2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.10.006
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献