Insertion torque and orthodontic mini-implants: A systematic review of the artificial bone literature

Author:

Meursinge Reynders Reint1,Ronchi Laura1,Ladu Luisa1,Van Etten-Jamaludin Faridi2,Bipat Shandra3

Affiliation:

1. Private Practice, Milan, Italy

2. Medical Library, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Departments of Radiology, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

This article systematically reviewed the literature to (1) identify variables that were associated with maximum insertion torque values during the insertion of orthodontic mini-implants into artificial bone, (2) quantify such associations and (3) assess adverse effects of this procedure. Computerized and manual searches were conducted up to 24 February 2012. Selection criteria included studies that (1) recorded maximum insertion torque during the insertion of orthodontic mini-implants into artificial bone, (2) used sample sizes of five screws or more, (3) assessed maximum insertion torque with electronic torque sensors, and (4) used orthodontic mini-implants with a diameter smaller than 2.5 mm. ASTM Standards F543-07ε1 and F1839-08ε1 and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews were used as guidelines for this systematic review. Quality assessments were rated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of 23 studies were selected, many of which were multiple publications of the same study. Many domains in the risk of bias assessments were scored as “high” or “unclear” risk of bias. A wide variety of implant, test block, and insertion procedure–related associations with maximum insertion torque were recorded. The quality of most outcomes was classified as “moderate.” Outcomes could not be combined in a meta-analysis because of high risk of bias, poor standardization, high heterogeneity, or inconsistency in direction of outcomes within or between studies. Adverse effects were only assessed in one study. Future studies should control publication bias, consult existing standards for conducting torque tests, and focus on transparent reporting.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,General Medicine

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Functionality testing of an innovative biomechanically optimized and surface-modified orthodontic mini-screw—a comparative study;Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie;2024-01-15

2. Evaluation of strain and insertion torque of mini-implants at 90° and 45° angulations on a bone model using three-dimensional finite element analysis;Contemporary Clinical Dentistry;2023

3. Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics;Orthodontic Evidence;2023

4. Research on the Combination of 3D Printing Technology and Computer Aided Industrial Design;2022 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT);2022-01-20

5. Finite element simulation and statistical investigation of an orthodontic mini-implant’s stability in a novel screw design;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine;2021-07-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3