Pre-clinical characterization of a novel flexible surface stem design for total knee replacements

Author:

Sass Jan-Oliver1ORCID,Hembus Jessica1,Fuhrmann Erik1,Vogel Danny1ORCID,Bauer Eckhard2,Link Helmut Detlef3,Bader Rainer1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

2. Jensen & Bauer GmbH & Co. KG, Noer, Germany

3. Waldemar LINK GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany

Abstract

Primary stability is crucial for implant osseointegration and the long-term stability of cementless total joint replacements. Biomechanical studies have shown the potential of femoral stems for total knee replacements to reduce micromotions at the bone-implant interface. However, approaches such as focusing on the structural elasticity of the femoral stems are rarely described. Three groups with different femoral stem designs were investigated: group 1: flexible surface stem, group 2: flexible surface stem with open-porous structured lamellas, and group 3: solid stem (reference). The stems were implanted into bone substitute material and dynamically loaded for 1000 cycles. Relative movement and subsidence were measured optically, and axial pull-out forces were determined after dynamic testing. Relative movements increased to 0.10 mm (groups 1 and 2) compared to 0.03 mm (group 3). Subsidence increased to 0.08 mm (group 1) and 0.11 mm (group 2) compared to 0.06 mm (group 3). For each group, subsidence mainly occurred during the first 500 cycles. A similar convergence was observed in the further course. Pull-out forces increased to 1815.0 N (group 1) and 1347.1 N (group 2) compared to 1306.4 N (group 3). The flexible surface stem design resulted in higher relative movements and subsidence, but also exhibited increased pull-out forces. The relative movements were below the critical limit of 0.15 mm and represent a superposition of the elastic deformations of the interacting implant components as well as the micromotion at the bone-implant interface. Therefore, the novel flexible surface stem design appears to offer promising primary implant fixation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,General Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. AJRR. American Joint Replacement Registry - annual report 2021, https://www.aaos.org/registries/publications/ajrr-annual-report/ (2022, accessed 19 September 2022).

2. EPRD. The German Arthroplasty Registry - annual report 2021, https://www.eprd.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Dateien/Publikationen/Berichte/AnnualReport2021-Web_2022-05-19_F.pdf (2022, accessed 19 September 2022).

3. SKAR. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register - annual report 2020, https://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK_2020_Eng_1.0.pdf (2021, accessed 19 September 2022).

4. How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry

5. Why Do Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties Fail? A Single-Center Review of 1632 Revision Total Knees Comparing Historic and Modern Cohorts

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3