Rehabilitation and Research Priorities in Deafblindness for the Next Decade

Author:

Wittich Walter1,Jarry Jonathan2,Groulx Geneviève3,Southall Kenneth4,Gagné Jean-Pierre5

Affiliation:

1. Assistant professor, CRIR/Centre de readaptation MAB-Mackay du CIUSSS du Centre-Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montreal; School of Optometry, University of Montreal, 3744, rue Jean-Brillant, room 260-7, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1P1, Canada

2. Research agent, School of Optometry, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

3. Research agent, CRIR/Centre de readaptation MAB-Mackay du CIUSSS du Centre-Ouest-de-l'ÎIe-de-Montréal, 7000 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R3, Canada

4. Adjunct professor, School of Social Work, McGill University, Centre de recherche institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, 4565, Chemin Queen-Mary, Montreal, Quebec, H3W 1W5, Canada

5. Professor, Έcole d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, Université de Montréal, Centre de recherche institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Quebéc, Canada

Abstract

Purpose Previous studies have guided the development of deafblindness rehabilitation by reporting on the priorities of researchers and of deafblind individuals; however, service and care providers may be able to bring a different and important perspective to shaping the development of this clinical field and its research. The present study aims to give them a voice in this process. Methods We conducted a qualitative survey in which 68 stakeholders in deaf-blind rehabilitation from 6 countries described their perceived research and rehabilitation priorities for the coming decade. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis through open coding, creating categories, and abstraction. Results Three categories of priorities emerged: those common to rehabilitation and research (such as assistive technology, communication services, and interdisciplinarity), those unique to rehabilitation (such as augmented service provision), and those unique to research (such as recruitment databases and measurement tools). Conclusions When viewing the findings from within the context of the existing research literature, the overlap indicated that research and rehabilitation efforts are moving in a congruent direction for researchers, service providers, and persons with deafblindness. Future efforts should focus on information exchange in order to improve evidence-based rehabilitation practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Ophthalmology

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3