Affiliation:
1. Daniela Berti is at the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (National Centre for Scientific Research) (CNRS), Centre for Himalayan Studies (CHS).
Abstract
This article examines the argument that people in India are strongly oriented towards litigation in court as against other forms of negotiation or advising. In spite of the centrality of the court system to Indian public life, the flow of cases arriving at court does not reflect any such fixed preference. Going to court may simply be a choice which the parties make in the first instance, but which will eventually be abandoned in favour of private forms of compromise. By drawing on the ethnography of a court case followed in a district court of Himachal Pradesh, this contribution will show how even in serious criminal cases where no private compromise is allowed, it often happens that all the prosecution witnesses deny before the judge what they are supposed to have previously stated to the police. The analysis of court interactions and out-of-court narratives will show how nonofficial forms of conciliation may internally unsettle the rules of evidence followed in criminal proceedings.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A theory of legal apparitions: regulation and escape in Indian divorces;International Journal of Law in Context;2023-06-02
2. Bibliography;Composing Violence;2023-01-20
3. Notes;Composing Violence;2023-01-20
4. Minor, Minorities, Minoritization;Composing Violence;2023-01-20
5. Composing the Archive;Composing Violence;2023-01-20