Affiliation:
1. Pratiksha Baxi is at the Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Abstract
This article draws attention to the culture of compromise that underwrites rape prosecutions. This aspect of rape prosecutions has not been sufficiently discussed either within the women’s movement, the judiciary or the contemporary discourse on judicial reform in India. I argue that the socio-legal process encapsulated in the word ‘compromise’ (or samadhan, the coexisting Gujarati usage) is an exposition of how secrecy may be thought of as ‘indispensable to the operation of power rather than as an abuse of power’ (Taussig 1999: 57). Unlike other forms of out-of-court settlements described as mechanisms of alternate dispute resolution, plea-bargaining or mediation in courts of law, compromise is not legal in rape cases in India. The term ‘culture of compromise’ emphasises how a criminal trial becomes a site for contestation between the accused, the complainant and the prosecuting agencies over how to monopolise the framing of an out-of-court settlement.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Violence in and by the Community;Violence, Gender and the State;2023-08-09
2. Hidden meanings of buffalo sacrifice;Animal Sacrifice, Religion and Law in South Asia;2023-07-10
3. Bibliography;Composing Violence;2023-01-20
4. Notes;Composing Violence;2023-01-20
5. Minor, Minorities, Minoritization;Composing Violence;2023-01-20