Capitalising on intuition and reflection: Making sense of a composer’s creative process

Abstract

This case study investigated the transformation of intuitive and reflective thinking during a composer’s compositional process. The qualitative data comprised stimulated recall interviews conducted in the composer’s studio during the compositional process and the entire manuscript corpus that the composer created during that process. The results showed the qualitative change in the composer’s intuitive and reflective thinking in the course of the process; within intuitive compositional acts, imagination changed into experimentation and incubation into restructuring, whereas within reflective compositional acts, rule-based reasoning changed into contemplating alternatives. Further, intuitive metacognition decreased while reflective metacognition increased. These changes were explained by concurrent procedures of grounding and rationalisation. In the grounding procedure, the composer substantiated the fuzzy construction of his original ideas (called the Identity Idea by the composer) into aesthetically coherent musical structures that gradually limited the compositional problem space. The rationalisation procedure involved the composer becoming increasingly proficient in the way in which he operated on his musical ideas and materials. After a critical moment, the composer adopted a situation-specific cognitive device called ‘rational intuition’. This ‘rational intuition’ was the composer’s way of creating aesthetic coherence when working fluently, albeit retaining rationality, in an insecure and complex working situation of a creative process. The prerequisites of ‘rational intuition’ were (1) the guidance of a goal-driven cue (i.e. the Identity Idea) as a key determinant and motivational energy for the process; (2) the selection of intuitive and reflective compositional acts to match compositional situations; (3) an expert ability to learn implicitly; and (4) resilience to abeyance.