Differences in clinical features and prognosis between orbit adenoid cystic carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: a study from the SEER 18 database

Author:

Liu Rui1ORCID,Li Jing1,Zhang Xuan2,Ge Xin1,Ma Jianmin1

Affiliation:

1. Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Tai’an City Central Hospital, Shandong, China

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the differences in clinical features, treatment methods, prognosis, and etiological factors between lacrimal gland, adenoid cystic carcinoma (LGACC), and orbit adenocarcinoma. Material and Methods: All cases of LGACC and orbit adenocarcinoma between 1975 and 2016 were obtained from the US National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: The 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates for 118 LGACC cases were 82.2%, 70.2%, and 51.7%, respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates for 29 orbit adenocarcinoma cases were 76.3%, 51.2%, and 51.2%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival rate between LGACC and adenocarcinoma (P=0.566). Univariate analysis showed that the proportion of deaths was higher with increased age and year of diagnosis in LGACC (P=0.010 and P=0.000), while the death rate was higher for poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (P=0.020). The survival rate for LGACC was lower in patients ⩾60 years of age than in those <60 years of age (P=0.035). There was no significant difference in survival rate between adenocarcinoma patients ⩾60 years and <60 years old (P=0.102). There was no significant correlation between the degree of tumor differentiation and the survival rate for LGACC or adenocarcinoma (P=0.401 or P=0.098, respectively). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in prognosis between LGACC and adenocarcinoma. The degree of tumor differentiation is not associated with prognosis for either LGACC or adenocarcinoma.

Funder

Beijing Hospitals Authority’ Ascent Plan

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3