Interobserver variability (between radiation oncologist and radiation therapist) in tumor bed contouring after breast-conserving surgery

Author:

La Rocca Eliana12,Lici Vanessa2,Giandini Tommaso3,Bonfantini Francesca3,Frasca Sarah1,Dispinzieri Michela12,Gennaro Massimiliano4,Di Cosimo Serena5,Lozza Laura1,Pignoli Emanuele3,Valdagni Riccardo26,De Santis Maria Carmen1

Affiliation:

1. Radiotherapy Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

2. Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

3. Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

4. Breast Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

5. Department of Applied Research and Technological Development (DRAST), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

6. Radiation Oncology 1 and Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

Abstract

Purpose: To examine interobserver variability between the radiation oncologist (RTO) and the radiation therapist (RTT) in delineating the tumor bed (TB) in early breast cancer (BC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who received a radiotherapy boost to the TB. In a first group, the clinical target volume (CTV) for the boost was the surgical bed, defined by using surgical clips. In a second group, the CTV was defined by identifying a seroma cavity or a metallic find on the scar. These contours were compared in terms of volume, number of slices, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Results: Forty patients were assessed: 20 had surgical clips (group 1) while the other 20 had none (group 2). There was no difference in the number of slices contoured by the 2 operators for group 1, but a statistically significant difference emerged in the volumes: the RTT identified a TB that was a mean 45% smaller than the one identified by the RTO. Random differences were found between the 2 operators for group 2. The TBs delineated for this group were significantly larger ( P<0.05) than those identified by the RTT for group 1. The mean Dice value between the RTO’s and the RTT’s TBs was 0.69±0.07 (range 0.53–0.81) for group 1 and 0.37±0.18 (range 0–0.58) for group 2 ( P<0.05). Conclusions: This study showed that the use of clips coincided with less interoperator variability. With appropriate training, the RTT may play an important part in the multidisciplinary radiotherapy team.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3